Researchers Report Fewer Teens Exposed to Secondhand Smoke After Smoking in Cars was Banned in England and Scotland

Several years ago England and Scotland passed laws making it illegal to smoke in vehicles when children are present. A recent report from researchers at Imperial College of London found that these laws are working, with fewer teens in both countries saying they are exposed to secondhand smoke while traveling in cars. Protecting children from secondhand smoke also protects them from toxic thirdhand smoke.

January 28, 2020

By: Lisa Rapaport

A law in the UK banning smoking in cars carrying children has been associated with a reduction in secondhand smoke exposure among teens, a new study suggests.
England banned smoking in vehicles carrying kids in 2015, and Scotland followed suit in 2016, researchers note in a new study published in Thorax. To assess how the first smoking ban impacted secondhand smoke exposure, they examined survey data collected in 2012, 2014 and 2016 from 15,318 teens in England and 822 in Scotland.
During the study period, the proportion of youth ages 13 to 15 who reported being exposed to secondhand smoke in cars dropped from 6.3% to 1.6% in England and from 3.4% to 1.3% in Scotland, the study found. The ban in England was associated with a 72% reduction in exposure to tobacco smoke among teens in this age group.
The much bigger drop in secondhand smoke exposure in England, where the ban took effect during the study period, suggests that the law likely played a role, said lead study author Anthony Laverty of Imperial College London.
“Smoking exposes children to air pollutants and chemicals such as tar, arsenic and formaldehyde,” Laverty said by email.
It can cause a range of childhood health problems and is associated with an increased risk of sudden infant death, asthma and lower respiratory tract infections, Laverty said. The risks associated with secondhand smoke exposure can be worse inside cars because pollutants are concentrated in a small enclosed place.
“We know that children with a parent who smokes will be more likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke, which put them at increased risk for infections and other potentially serious diseases,” Laverty said. “We also know that they will be more likely to take up smoking themselves.”
The study focused on young teens who could respond to their own survey questions instead of having a parent provide answers on their behalf. Children were asked how often, over the past year, they had traveled in a car with an adult who smoked during the journey.
Girls and young people from lower-income communities were more likely to report secondhand smoke exposure in cars, the study also found.
The study can’t prove whether or how the ban might have directly affected smoke exposure in cars. It also didn’t evaluate health outcomes.
“Secondhand smoke is the air pollution created by smoking cigarettes during the 90% of the time that the cigarette is not being smoked,” said Jodi Prochaska, a researcher at Stanford University in California who wasn’t involved in the study. It contains “more than 7,000 chemicals, including approximately 70 known cancer-causing agents such as formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide,” she noted.
Even though nonsmokers receive a much lower total dose of these chemicals than the smoker, the effects on blood vessels, blood and the heart are surprisingly large, she added.
Smoking in a vehicle with the windows closed can also generate more than 100 times the EPA’s 24-hour recommended exposure limit to particles that irritate the respiratory system and can seep from the lungs into the bloodstream, Prochaska said.
“Smoking by parents causes respiratory symptoms and slows lung growth in their children,” Prochaska, who has consulted for drug and technology companies on smoking cessation treatments, said by email.
“The scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke,” Prochaska said. “Only eliminating smoking in indoor spaces fully protects nonsmokers from exposure to secondhand smoke – ventilation systems do not eliminate exposures.”
Source
Note: Content was edited for style and length.

Click here to read the research study.

More Must Read Stories

A row of apartments on a sunny day. The image has the title “The California Fair Employment and Housing Act Can Help Tenants Avoid Second- and Thirdhand Smoke.”

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act Can Help Tenants in Multiunit Housing Avoid Second- and Thirdhand Smoke

Do you live in California and have medical conditions made worse by from tobacco smoke intrusion? If you live in multiunit housing, you may be able to get help from California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act.

A wooden decoration that says “home” and a set of house keys lie on a table. A question about the smoking history on the Seller Property Questionnaire is in the bottom right corner.

What can I do to Avoid Thirdhand Smoke when Buying a House in California?

A team at the Thirdhand Smoke Resource Center examined home disclosure documents commonly used in San Diego to see how well they inform buyers about the smoking history of their potential home.

Children’s Hands Can Tell us if They were Exposed to Thirdhand Smoke

A recent study from San Diego State University suggests that nicotine on the hands of children is one of the most effective ways to measure children’s thirdhand smoke exposure over time and in different environments. In collaboration with colleagues at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, the researchers

Silhouette rows of people stand with the words "56 million Americans" in front

56 Million Americans Don’t Know They’re Exposed to Tobacco Smoke – Thirdhand Smoke Could be to Blame

Over half of Americans who don’t smoke are exposed to tobacco, but only one-third are aware of it, according to a recent University of Florida study.

An electronic cigarette and conventional cigarette fight a pair of lungs.

Is the chemical residue from electronically heated tobacco products different from the chemical residue from traditional cigarettes?

A recent study compared the effects of chemical residue from using electronically heated tobacco products to chemical residue from smoking on lung cells. It turns out that both kinds of chemical residue can damage lungs.